AMD and Intel have been battling it out in the CPU market for decades. With AMD’s Ryzen 5000 series mobile processors, they have closed the performance gap with Intel’s 11th Gen Core i7 chips. Two popular models to consider are the AMD Ryzen 7 5825U and the Intel Core i7-1165G7.
The Ryzen 7 5825U is part of AMD’s newest Zen 3 architecture, while the Core i7-1165G7 uses Intel’s older 10nm Tiger Lake design. Though both pack impressive performance into a low 15W power envelope, there are some key differences worth examining.
Specs | AMD Ryzen 7 5825U | Intel Core i7-1165G7 |
Cores/Threads | 8/16 | 4/8 |
Boost Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
Graphics | Radeon | Iris Xe |
Process Node | 7nm | 10nm |
TDP | 15W | 15W |
As you can see from the table, the Ryzen 7 5825U offers more cores and threads, while the Core i7 has a slightly higher boost clock speed. The Ryzen processor uses AMD’s latest 7nm manufacturing process, compared to Intel’s aging 10nm node. Both have integrated graphics, with AMD relying on Radeon and Intel using their new Iris Xe graphics.
Now let’s dive deeper into the specs, performance, and real-world usage comparisons.
The Ryzen 7 5825U uses AMD’s newest Zen 3 CPU architecture, which delivers excellent single and multi-threaded performance. Zen 3 brings an 8% IPC (instructions per cycle) gain over the prior Zen 2 architecture.
Intel’s Core i7-1165G7 is based on their long-running Skylake microarchitecture, now rebranded under the 10nm Tiger Lake family. While Intel has refined Skylake over the years, it faces challenges keeping up with AMD’s more advanced and power-efficient Zen 3 design.
In terms of core counts, the Ryzen chip wins hands down with its 8-core/16-thread configuration. The Core i7 only has 4-cores and 8-threads. More cores allow the Ryzen processor to excel at multi-threaded workloads like video editing, 3D modeling, and heavy multitasking.
Independent benchmark tests reveal how these two processors compare in real-world scenarios. Here are some key benchmark results:
The Ryzen chip wins out in multi-threaded tests like Cinebench and Handbrake encoding with its extra cores, though the Core i7 has a slightly faster peak single-core speed. The Ryzen 7 5825U is around 15-20% faster for serious workstation tasks.
For everyday productivity in office apps and web browsing, both deliver excellent performance and will handle light gaming equally well. The differences come through in CPU-intensive creative software, programming tools, video editing and 3D rendering where the Ryzen 7’s extra muscle is beneficial.
Watch the video of Intel Core i7!
These processors rely on integrated graphics, rather than dedicated GPUs like Nvidia’s RTX chips. But the integrated graphics have improved considerably over past generations.
The Ryzen 7 5825U uses AMD’s Radeon graphics with up to 8 Radeon cores, while the Core i7-1165G7 has Intel’s new Iris Xe graphics. Iris Xe offers huge gains over past Intel integrated graphics and gets close to Radeon’s performance.
Benchmarks show the Radeon GPU on the Ryzen chip scoring around 15-20% higher in 3DMark’s graphics tests. For casual gaming at 1080p, either chip will work fine, but the Ryzen will deliver higher framerates and graphics quality in more demanding titles. Overall AMD still has a graphics advantage.
A key metric for mobile processors is power efficiency and battery life. AMD has improved efficiency considerably with their 7nm Zen 3 chips.
Comparing 15W TDP models, the Ryzen 7 5825U can beat the Core i7-1165G7 in battery life during light workflows. Intel still has an advantage in video playback efficiency. But for day-to-day Office apps, web browsing, and moderate multitasking, the Ryzen chip competes well in power consumption.
Much depends on laptop design, battery size, display resolution and other factors. But in optimized designs, the Ryzen 5000 series can match or exceed Intel’s 11th Gen Core i7 for real-world battery life.
AMD’s recent success is largely thanks to undercutting Intel’s prices while offering comparable performance. The Ryzen 7 5825U retails around $415, while the Core i7-1165G7 goes for approximately $426.
At nearly equal pricing, the performance benefits and extra cores of the Ryzen 7 5825U make it a better value choice over the Core i7 model. With superior multi-threaded speed, comparable single-core performance, and similar power efficiency, the Ryzen chip gives you more for your money.
Yes, the latest Ryzen 7 processors are generally faster than equivalent Core i7 models. AMD has closed the performance gap through architectural improvements like Zen 3. Ryzen 7 chips have more cores for demanding multitasking and workstation tasks where they clearly beat i7.
The closest Intel competitor to the Ryzen 7 5825U is the Core i7-1165G7. Both are current generation mobile processors with a 15W TDP. The Ryzen chip outperforms the i7 thanks to having twice as many cores and threads.
Yes, the Ryzen 7 5825U is an excellent processor, especially for thin and light laptops. It provides fast single and multi-threaded speed, great integrated graphics, and competitive battery life all within a 15W power budget. The extra cores make it ideal for demanding creative work.
There used to be a more significant difference in past generations favoring Intel. But AMD has nearly eliminated that gap. The biggest remaining difference is Ryzen 7 chips offer more cores and threads which is beneficial for multi-tasking. Ryzen 7 also has an advantage in graphics performance. But both provide great overall speed for most needs.
Also Read: Is ThinkPad P16 Better Than P1?
So in summary, thanks to excellent multi-threaded speed, solid single-core performance, leading graphics and competitive power draw, the Ryzen 7 5825U is the better buy and a superior overall processor compared to the Core i7-1165G7. If your work involves heavy workstation tasks, AMD is currently dominating this mobile CPU match-up.
In the world of luxury home design, few materials can match the elegance and sophistication… Read More
As car enthusiasts, we understand the importance of maintaining the interior of our beloved rides.… Read More
Greetings, fellow string enthusiasts! Whether you're a seasoned violinist or a budding virtuoso, the choice… Read More