Consumer drones have exploded in popularity in recent years as the technology has improved and prices have become more affordable. Two models that offer an enticing balance of features and value are the Ruko F11 Gim and Ruko F11 Gim2 quadcopters.
But how exactly do these two budget-friendly flyers stack up? Let’s take a detailed look at their similarities and differences.
| Specs | Ruko F11 Gim | Ruko F11 Gim2 |
| Camera Resolution | 1080p | 4K |
| Camera FOV | 120° | 140° |
| Motors | Brushed | Brushless |
| Electronic Image Stabilization | No | Yes |
| Max Flight Time | ~20 minutes | ~25 minutes |
| **5.8G WiFi Range ** | Standard | Enhanced |
| Headless Mode | Yes | Yes |
| Altitude Hold | Yes | Yes |
| MSRP | $89 | $129 |
The Ruko F11 Gim was released in 2019 as an upgraded alternative to the brand’s original F11 drone. It includes several enhancements like a better camera and transmission system. In late 2022, Ruko then launched the F11 Gim2, which keeps most of the predecessor’s design but ups the performance in key areas.
Both drones promise novice and intermediate pilots a fun way to capture aerial footage without breaking the bank. They share user-friendly designs optimized for beginning flyers along with built-in cameras capable of recording 1080p video and transmitting a first-person view (FPV) to a smartphone. However, the Ruko F11 Gim2 does gain some useful updates that diehard hobbyists may appreciate.
Now let’s explore those changes in more depth alongside a full pros and cons breakdown. We’ll also answer some common questions about Ruko’s performance claims.
Also Read: Choose Between FLIR Scout TK And TKx.
While the Ruko F11 Gim2 retains its predecessor’s core design, it brings notable improvements in three main areas: the camera quality, flight controls and stability, and battery life. The biggest differences lie with the enhanced imaging specs and transmission technology, so visual creators will likely get the most out of the upgrade.
However, even casual users should enjoy flying the Gim2 more thanks to tweaks that increase airtime and smoothing.
The cameras represent the most substantial change between models. The Ruko F11 Gim equipped a basic 1080p shooter, while the F11 Gim2 boasts a sharper 4K camera. Along with quadrupling the resolution, it also expands the field-of-view to 140° for more dramatic footage. The Gim2’s images should demonstrate better clarity and a wider perspective of the surroundings below.
Both Ruko drones rely on WiFi to broadcast live video feeds from the camera to an attached smartphone. This first-person view enables pilots to compose shots as if they were sitting in the cockpit. However, the Gim2 enhances the FPV range and latency using a higher-bandwidth signal. Users can expect a more reliable connection with less lag or glitching, especially at long distances.
While the Ruko F11 Gim handled nicely out of the box, Ruko engineered its successor for even better stability and responsiveness in the air. It switched out the brushless motors, which are more durable and efficient than the Gim’s brushed units. The improved engines have a better thrust-to-weight ratio for nimbler maneuvering. They team up with new electronic image stabilization (EIS) tech that counters vibrations and jerky movements to produce smoother footage.
The enhanced performance should give budding aerial videographers more confidence while filming. Between the upgraded motors and stabilization, the F11 Gim2 will hold its position better in windy conditions with less drifting. The EIS will also reduce distorted shots resulting from rapid pitching/rolling or gusts. Novices in particular should find the drone easier to control.
Both the Gim and Gim2 models retain user-friendly options like headless mode, altitude hold, and flip functions that appeal to beginners and intermediates. So the core flight modes do not substantially change between them.
While many users crave longer airtime, flight durations often take a backseat to imaging and handling improvements. Still, Ruko did fit a higher-capacity battery in the F11 Gim2 rated for up to 25 minutes per charge cycle. That’s a nice little bump up from the original’s approximately 20-minute limit for those wanting to extend filming sessions. Just keep an extra pack or two on hand.
| Ruko F11 Gim | Ruko F11 Gim2 |
| ✓️ Great value pick for beginners | ✓️ Retains predecessor’s novice-friendly design |
| ✓️ Lightweight and portable frame | ✓️ Adds sharper 4K camera and better FPV system |
| ✓️ Easy to fly even indoors | ✓️ Upgraded motors and stabilization for smoother footage |
| ✓️ Altitude hold and navigation modes for training wheels | ✓️ Slightly better flight time from bigger battery |
| ❌ Limited transmission range | ❌ Mostly iterative update aside from camera and stability |
| ❌ No EIS so videos can look shaky | ❌ Similar plastic airframe that may not withstand crashes |
| ❌ Battery life caps out around 20 minutes | ❌ No advanced capabilities beyond casual use |
Also watch the video of Ruko F11 Gim2!
The Ruko F11 Gim2 justifies its moderately higher price over the prior model with valuable upgrades like 4K video recording, better FPV feed, and extended airtime. Visually oriented users will get the most mileage out of the superior imaging and transmission quality. Novices should also benefit from the improved stability and responsiveness while mastering their skills.
However, the original Gim still offers a competitively priced alternative for beginners mainly interested in fooling around. Pilots focused more on having fun than capturing cinema-quality clips may not utilize the Gim2’s upgrades enough to warrant spending extra. The lower-res camera and footage may suffice if you just want some airborne selfies and not professional-looking aerial photography.
Ruko advertises a max remote control range reaching around 300 meters or 980 feet. Keep in mind the weaker WiFi FPV feed is more likely to drop out before then.
The Ruko F11 Gim2 shares the same approx 300-meter RC range as the prior model per the manufacturer. But its higher-bandwidth WiFi allows it to maintain a first-person video downlink from slightly farther compared to the F11 Gim.
As ultra-budget options, both the Ruko F11 Gim and Ruko F11 Gim2 offer compelling value given their low costs. They work well for capturing casual aerial footage and learning to fly. However, pricier prosumer drones typically have better build quality, features, and reliability. Manage expectations appropriately when purchasing consumer/toy grades.
The Ruko F11 Gim2 tips the scales at around 390 grams with the standard battery loaded. That keeps it safely under the 250-gram threshold for registering as a drone in many countries. It uses the same plastic airframe as the Gim, with the new battery adding a bit more heft.
Also Read: Comparison Between Ricoh WG-80 And Olympus TG-6.
The Ruko F11 Gim2 brings worthwhile refinements over its predecessor, primarily to imaging and flight stabilization for improved aerial footage. Novices can better grasp basic flight mechanics thanks to tweaks boosting stability and battery runtimes.
Thus visual creators receive the most substantial gains and justification for upgrading. Though the original Gim still flies great considering its bargain price.
Ultimately both these Ruko drones accomplish the same mission – offering beginner and intermediate pilots an affordable gateway into aerial photography. The Gim2 simply stacks additional value onto an already solid foundation. So weigh your personal priorities and budget to decide which model better matches the experience you want.
In the world of luxury home design, few materials can match the elegance and sophistication… Read More
As car enthusiasts, we understand the importance of maintaining the interior of our beloved rides.… Read More
Greetings, fellow string enthusiasts! Whether you're a seasoned violinist or a budding virtuoso, the choice… Read More