Exchange-traded funds (ETFs) have become increasingly popular investment vehicles for retail and institutional investors alike. ETFs offer the diversity of mutual funds but trade intraday like stocks. Two ETFs that have attracted significant investor interest are the Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) and Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ).
But how exactly do these two growth-focused ETFs compare? This comprehensive, 2100-word guide provides an in-depth analysis of VUG and QQQ to help investors decide which (if either) is right for their portfolio.
Attribute | VUG | QQQ |
Launch Date | 2004 | 1999 |
Assets under Management | $56 billion | $150 billion |
# of Holdings | 268 | 102 |
Expense Ratio | 0.04% | 0.20% |
Top 10 Weight | 23.3% | 55.7% |
Dividend Yield | 0.71% | 0.78% |
Best For | Broad growth stock exposure, diversification | Concentrated Nasdaq-100 exposure, mega-cap tech |
The Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index, which represents the growth companies of the CRSP US Large Cap Index. VUG was launched in January 2004 and has $56 billion in assets under management as of October 2023.
VUG invests in stocks of large U.S. companies that are projected to grow faster than other large-cap stocks. It includes stocks that exhibit growth characteristics such as high earnings growth and high valuations. VUG holds 268 stocks as of October 2023, with top holdings including Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, and Tesla. The fund is heavily weighted towards information technology at 43.4% of the portfolio.
The Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index, which comprises the 100 largest domestic and international non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market based on market capitalization. QQQ was launched in March 1999 and has $150 billion in assets under management as of October 2023.
QQQ invests in the largest non-financial stocks on the Nasdaq across major industry groups like technology, consumer services, health care, and more. Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta Platforms, Tesla, NVIDIA, and PepsiCo are the top 8 holdings, comprising nearly half of assets. QQQ is heavily exposed to information technology at 48.8% of the fund.
One key difference between VUG and QQQ lies in their index construction methodologies.
As a result, VUG employs a multifactor strategy targeting high growth companies specifically, while QQQ tracks large cap companies listed on the Nasdaq exchange using a market-cap approach with some concentration risk controls.
Both VUG and QQQ have delivered strong returns over the long run, although there are some differences in their performance.
Here is a comparison of average annual returns as of September 30, 2022:
1 Year | 3 Years | 5 Years | 10 Years |
VUG: -29.28% | VUG: 10.53% | VUG: 12.85% | VUG: 14.53% |
QQQ: -27.01% | QQQ: 11.48% | QQQ: 15.37% | QQQ: 16.21% |
Over the past 1, 3, 5, and 10 year periods, QQQ has outperformed VUG by a small margin. This is likely attributable to the strong performance of mega-cap technology stocks like Apple, Microsoft and others that represent a substantial portion of QQQ.
However, over the long run, the performance differential has been minor. Both ETFs have handily beaten the S&P 500 over 10 years. And VUG has exhibited lower volatility than QQQ over time.
When comparing ETFs, expense ratios are an important factor for investors to consider. Lower expense ratios mean more of your investment goes directly into the assets of the fund rather than covering administrative fees.
Here is how VUG and QQQ compare on expenses:
VUG has a significantly lower expense ratio than QQQ. This is not surprising given that Vanguard is well-known for its low-cost index funds and ETFs. The difference in expense ratio means VUG has lower costs for investors.
For income-oriented investors, the dividend profile of an ETF is an important consideration.
VUG has traditionally paid higher dividends than QQQ:
However, dividend yields for both ETFs are quite low, as they focus on investing in growth companies that reinvest earnings into expansion rather than making dividend payouts. Neither ETF should be considered a source of substantial dividend income.
When comparing ETFs, it is instructive to examine how the funds allocate assets to different economic sectors. This can reveal key differences in investment strategy and risk exposures.
Here is the sector allocation for VUG and QQQ as of September 30, 2022:
Sector | VUG Allocation | QQQ Allocation |
Information Technology | 43.4% | 48.8% |
Consumer Discretionary | 15.5% | 17.2% |
Healthcare | 12.3% | 10.5% |
Communication Services | 11.7% | 7.7% |
Financials | 6.3% | 0.6% |
Industrials | 5.4% | 5.0% |
Consumer Staples | 3.6% | 6.1% |
Other | 1.8% | 4.1% |
The sector allocation highlights the strong technology tilt of both ETFs, which account for their growth investing mandates. However, QQQ has an even greater weight towards technology at 48.8% compared to 43.4% for VUG.
Meanwhile, VUG has more exposure to sectors like financials and communication services. This results in VUG having a slightly more balanced sector allocation, while QQQ is heavily dependent on technology stocks.
Also Read: Differences Between ADP And OnPay.
The number of holdings can also impact the risk profile and diversification of an ETF:
VUG holds significantly more stocks than QQQ. With over 150 more positions, VUG offers greater diversification benefits for investors within its universe of large cap growth stocks.
In contrast, QQQ is relatively concentrated in its top 10 holdings, which account for over 50% of its portfolio. The QQQ ETF is less diversified, meaning its performance is more tied to the fortunes of its largest constituents like Apple and Microsoft.
In addition to comparing the number of holdings, it is useful to examine index concentration to gauge diversification. Index concentration refers to the weight of the top 10 companies in the index.
Here is the index concentration for each ETF:
This data highlights that QQQ is heavily concentrated in its top 10 holdings, with over half its portfolio weight in just 10 stocks. VUG is significantly less top-heavy, with its top 10 holdings accounting for only 23% of the fund.
QQQ’s higher concentration means its performance is more dependent on the performance of companies like Apple, Microsoft, Amazon and Alphabet. VUG takes a broader approach to the growth stock universe.
Also watch the video!
Pros
Cons
Pros
Cons
VUG could be considered a better choice than QQQ for investors concerned about concentration risk, expenses, and diversification. With far more holdings and lower portfolio weight in the top 10 names, VUG offers broader exposure to the growth stock universe. VUG also has a lower expense ratio. However, QQQ has historically outperformed slightly, while providing concentrated exposure to mega-cap tech and internet stocks.
QQQ is one of the most popular growth-focused ETFs due to its heavy exposure to major technology and internet stocks like Apple, Microsoft, Google, Amazon, and others. While very dependent on these mega-caps for performance, QQQ has handsomely beat the S&P 500 over time. But concentration in top names elevates risk. Funds like VUG provide growth exposure with lower concentration.
QQQ is not technically an index fund, but an ETF tracking the Nasdaq-100 index. It provides investors with a low-cost, liquid way to invest in the 100 largest non-financial stocks on the Nasdaq. While among the most widely held ETFs, QQQ is highly concentrated in its top 10 names like Apple and Microsoft. Funds tracking broader indexes like the S&P 500 may be considered “best” by some investors.
QQQ is among the best performing ETFs over the past 10 years, with annualized returns of 16.21% as of September 2022 compared to 11.70% for the S&P 500. Much of QQQ’s outperformance can be attributed to its heavy concentration in mega-cap tech stocks. But the fund is not the absolute top performer among ETFs, with some sector funds like energy outpacing it over certain periods.
Also Read: Differences Between Netgate And SonicWall.
So which ETF is the better choice for investors – VUG or QQQ? Here are a few key considerations:
In summary, VUG is likely the superior choice for investors concerned about concentration risk and expenses. But QQQ may be favored by traders and those seeking maximum exposure to the mega-cap technology stocks driving growth.
This covers the key points of difference between the Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). In summary, VUG offers broader diversification within the growth segment, while QQQ provides concentrated exposure to the largest technology and internet stocks. Investors should weigh factors like concentration risk, expenses, performance history, and holdings when deciding between these two quality ETFs.
In the world of luxury home design, few materials can match the elegance and sophistication… Read More
As car enthusiasts, we understand the importance of maintaining the interior of our beloved rides.… Read More
Greetings, fellow string enthusiasts! Whether you're a seasoned violinist or a budding virtuoso, the choice… Read More